THEORIES & FACTS ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ON 9/11 👀 🏢 🇺🇸
Many have different ideas and beliefs about what really happened on 9/11. Here are a few notable ones as we approach the anniversary for one of Americas most tragic events in American history. You be the judge.
1. Top Theory -
This theory proposes that the destruction of the towers required explosive demolition. Ownership of the building had changed, for the first time, shortly before the 9/11 attacks, and new owner Larry Silverstein made a $500m insurance profit. Theorists note that John O'Neill, a senior counter-intelligence officer (who had resigned from the FBI in August 2001) took over security at the WTC on the day of the attacks.
The question on everyone’s mind is: Why is Silverstein claiming that airliners destroyed his buildings, when he has already confessed to demolishing at least one of them himself? In the 2002 PBS documentary “America Rebuilds,” Silverstein admitted to complicity in the controlled demolition of WTC-7, a 47-story skyscraper that dropped into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds.
The mysterious destruction of Building 7 has become the Rosetta Stone of 9/11. Virtually all independent experts who have studied the case, including thousands of architects and engineers, agree that this was obviously taken down in a controlled demolition, as Silverstein himself admitted. Despite his confession to demolishing his own building, Silverstein has already received $861 million from insurers for Building 7 alone. That $861 million for WTC-7 was paid on the basis of Silverstein’s claim that airplanes were somehow responsible for making Building 7, which was not hit by any plane, disappear at free-fall acceleration.
On September 14, 2002, the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) aired a documentary on reconstrucion of the former World Trader Center site. The show's title was "America Rebuilds." During this documentary, the developer of World Trade Center (WTC) Building 7, Larry Silverstein said that he and "the commander" of the New York City Fire Department had decided to "pull" WTC Building 7 late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001.
Silverstein States:
"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it". And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
To "pull" a building, in the lexicon of realtors and Fire Departments, is to demolish it. Thus, in its context, Larry Silverstein's repeated use of the phrase "to pull" means "to demolish." At another point, earlier in this "America Rebuilds" documentary, there is a sequence of quotes about WTC Building 6, a building also brought to ground on the morning of 9-11, which makes clear that "to pull" means to demolish:
The conclusion? Larry Silverstein's nationally aired statement means, simply, that he and others must have prepared WTC Building 7 for demolition. Could this preparation for demolition have taken place on a single afternoon? It was a 47-story skyscraper containing 2 million square feet of office space. This preparation must have taken at least several weeks before Sept. 11, 2001.
OTHER WELL- KNOWN THEORIES-
2. Friends in oil-
Seventy-five top professors and scientists comprising '9/11 Scholars For Truth' believe people in the oil industry, along with President Bush, puppetered the events to secure oil reserves. It is claimed they arranged a 'stand-down' of the air-force for the event. Some see a cover-up to protect the Saudi royal family and Enron's interests in Afghanistan. Others see an Al-Qaeda chain of command which ran through pro-Western Saudis and Pakistani intelligence to forces in the US (and MI6). (Research Saudi Royal Ties With Bush Family and America)
3. The military-industrial complex
Forces at the Pentagon, keen on a coup d'etat by the military-industrial complex, are said to have covered up that a drone plane or missile that hit the Pentagon. Furthermore they shot down Flight 93 into a field when it became surplus to requirements. Some, including former MI5 whistleblower David Shaylor, believe no planes were involved in the attack, but missiles shrouded in holograms. (Click Here For More About This Theory)
4. Robbery -
Comex was believed to have had $950m worth of gold under the WTC prior to the attack, and only $230m is said to have been recovered, leading some to believe 9/11 was the cover for a massive robbery or fraud; the biggest 'safe cracking' ever.
--
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/29/attacks.insurance/index.html
http://www.theweek.co.uk/us/conspiracy-theories/28177/top-ten-911-conspiracy-theories
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/07/15/larry-trial/
https://www.infowars.com/911-could-be-insurance-fraud-as-trial-of-conspiring-duo-begins-in-ny-today/
http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue8/Don_Paul.cfm