"Should We Be Eating Lab-Grown Meat? Innovation or Playing God?"

What’s the Big Deal About Lab-Grown Meat?

We live in a time where technology is changing everything—including the way we make food. One of the newest and most talked-about developments is lab-grown meat (also called cultured or cell-based meat). It’s being seen as a possible solution to some big problems, like pollution from farming and animal cruelty.

But not everyone agrees. Some people are asking deeper questions: What does it mean for something to really be “food”? Are we going too far by creating meat in a lab? And how could this new kind of meat affect our culture, our health, or even our jobs in the future?​

The Science Behind Lab-Grown Meat

Lab-grown meat is made by taking a few cells from a real animal—no need to kill it—and growing those cells in a lab. The cells are placed in a warm, nutrient-packed liquid that helps them grow, kind of like how plants grow with water and sunlight. Over time, the cells naturally form into muscle and fat, just like the meat you’d find in a grocery store.

Some companies, like Meatable, have developed faster ways to do this. They can grow meat in just four days, making the process quicker and more efficient than traditional farming.

Time

Environmental and Ethical Considerations

Supporters of lab-grown meat believe it could help solve some serious environmental problems. Right now, raising animals for meat—like cows and pigs—creates a lot of pollution and greenhouse gases, which contribute to climate change. It also takes up tons of land, water, and resources.

Since lab-grown meat doesn’t require raising and killing animals, it could cut down on things like deforestation, water waste, and air pollution. Plus, because no animals are harmed in the process, it’s seen as a more ethical choice—without sacrificing taste or nutrition.

Health Implications and Safety

Beyond environmental and ethical benefits, lab-grown meat presents potential public health advantages. Traditional meat production often involves the use of antibiotics to prevent disease in livestock, contributing to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Cultured meat production can be tightly controlled, reducing the need for antibiotics and lowering the risk of foodborne illnesses. ​Reddit

Consumer Acceptance and Social Stigma

Even though lab-grown meat has a lot of benefits, not everyone is ready to jump on board. Some people worry it’s not “natural,” or they have questions about how safe it really is. Others just feel weird about eating something made in a lab instead of on a farm.

A study found that many folks are still unsure about how it would taste—and whether they can trust it. To help people feel more comfortable, companies need to be honest about how the meat is made, prove it’s safe, and slowly introduce it into everyday food culture so it doesn’t feel so unfamiliar. ScienceDirectPMC

Economic and Regulatory Landscape

The commercialization of lab-grown meat also navigates complex economic and regulatory terrains. Production costs, while decreasing, remain higher than those of conventional meat, posing challenges for widespread market adoption. Regulatory agencies are developing frameworks to ensure the safety and proper labeling of cultured meat products. For instance, the UK government has allocated funds to establish a regulatory system for lab-grown meats, reflecting a proactive approach to integrating this innovation into the food industry. ​WikipediaThe GuardianLatest news & breaking headlines

Conclusion

Lab-grown meat brings together science, ethics, and social values all in one big conversation. On one hand, it shows how creative and smart humans can be when solving global problems like climate change and food shortages. On the other hand, it makes us think more deeply: Just because we can do something—should we?

As we look ahead to the future of food, it’s important to ask the right questions. Are we respecting cultural traditions? Are we being fair and ethical? And are we making choices that help everyone—not just a few?​

"Is Tech Addiction the New Mental Health Crisis? Gen Z vs. the Algorithm"

Today, almost everyone uses smartphones, social media, and streaming apps every day—especially Gen Z. But now, more people are asking: Are we getting too hooked? Could this be turning into a serious mental health problem? As algorithms become increasingly better at capturing our attention, concerns grow about their impact on mental health, attention spans, and personal identity.​ Is Tech starting to affect how we feel, how long we can focus, and even how we see ourselves?

The Rise of Tech Addiction

Generation Z, individuals born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, have grown up immersed in technology. Smartphones, social media platforms, and instant access to information are integral to their daily lives. However, this constant connectivity has led to an over-reliance on digital devices, with studies indicating that excessive screen time correlates with higher rates of depression and anxiety among young adults. ​

Algorithms and the Battle for Attention

Social media platforms employ sophisticated algorithms designed to maximize user engagement. These algorithms curate content based on user behavior, creating personalized feeds that encourage prolonged usage. While this customization enhances user experience, it also fosters a cycle of continuous scrolling, often referred to as "doomscrolling," which can negatively affect mental health. ​Mediumnews

Impact on Mental Health and Identity

Technology isn’t just changing how we communicate—it’s also changing how we see ourselves. Social media shows us everyone’s “best moments,” which can make us feel like we’re not doing enough or don’t measure up.

Trying to keep up, post regularly, and look a certain way online can become stressful. That pressure can mess with our confidence, increase anxiety, and make some people feel more alone—even if they’re always “connected.”​

Addressing the Crisis

Recognizing the detrimental effects of tech addiction is the first step towards solutions. Strategies such as setting screen time limits, engaging in offline activities, and fostering real-world social connections can help individuals regain control over their digital habits. Try things like, "Phone-free February" encourage people to reduce screen time, leading to improved concentration, better sleep quality, and enhanced mental well-being. ​The Sun+1news+1adelaidenow

Conclusion

As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative to balance its benefits with mindful usage. For Generation Z, navigating the digital landscape requires awareness of the potential pitfalls of tech addiction and proactive measures to safeguard mental health and personal identity.​

“The War on Masculinity & Femininity: Reclaiming Divine Balance”

From the way we think to how we move through the world, we all carry a mix of masculine and feminine energy. These energies go deeper than gender—they're spiritual forces that shape how we lead, love, protect, create, and heal. But in today’s culture, where social media, politics, and trends constantly redefine who we’re “supposed” to be, many of us are left confused—playing roles that don't feel like our own. The truth is, the farther we drift from that natural balance, the more disconnected we become from our purpose, our peace, and our people. Reclaiming this balance isn’t just personal growth—it’s the next level of human evolution.

The Essence of Masculine and Feminine Energies

Masculine energy is traditionally associated with qualities such as assertiveness, logic, and action, while feminine energy embodies intuition, nurturing, and receptivity. Both energies exist within every individual, regardless of biological sex, and their equilibrium is essential for personal well-being and societal harmony. When these energies are out of balance, it can lead to personal distress and societal discord. ​

Modern Distortions and Their Impact

In today's media landscape, representations of gender roles often reinforce stereotypes, contributing to societal confusion. If you’ve scrolled through TikTok or YouTube lately, you’ve probably seen it—creators preaching “real masculinity” or women glamorizing the “trad wife” lifestyle. For instance, the "femosphere" has emerged as an online space that, while appearing to advocate for women's empowerment, often promotes conservative values under the guise of feminism, drawing women into potentially toxic environments. This mirrors the "manosphere," which has been criticized for radicalizing young men. ​The Guardian

And then there’s the “trad wife” trend—where women lean into 1950s-style homemaking. While some say it’s about choice and values, others see it as a reaction to broken systems: unaffordable childcare, burnout culture, and the rising cost of independence. The problem? When trends pretend to be empowerment but quietly reinforce oppression, we lose sight of what real freedom looks like—for everyone. ​The New Yorker

Reconnecting with Ancestral Wisdom

Long before social media told us how to “be a man” or “act like a lady,” many ancestral cultures already had it figured out. From African tribes to Indigenous nations, there was deep respect for both masculine and feminine energies—not as opposites, but as partners. These traditions didn’t box people in. Instead, they understood that strength and softness, action and intuition, leadership and nurturing all had sacred value—and that balance was the goal, not dominance.

Tapping back into that ancestral wisdom isn’t just about history—it’s about healing. It reminds us that who we are at our core isn’t broken; we’ve just been disconnected. And maybe, reconnecting is exactly what today’s culture needs. ​My Spiritual Shenanigans

Pathways to Healing and Integration

So how do we get back to balance? It starts with doing the inner work. Real healing doesn’t happen through aesthetics or algorithms—it happens through intention. Here’s how you can start:

• Check Your Conditioning:
  Ask yourself: Where did my ideas about gender come from? Society? Family? Social media? Be honest about the stereotypes you’ve internalized—and give yourself permission to rewrite them.

• Feel Everything, Not Just What’s “Expected”:
  Strength isn’t just about power. It’s also about vulnerability. Let yourself be soft when you need to be, and bold when it matters. You’re allowed to be both.

• Expand Your Lens:
  Read books. Watch films. Listen to voices outside your bubble—especially from cultures and communities that celebrate gender fluidity, duality, and spiritual balance.

• Get Quiet, Then Go Deep:
  Mindfulness practices like meditation or journaling help you connect with your true energy—not the one you perform for the world. When you’re still, your real self starts to speak.

Conclusion

The journey toward reclaiming divine balance between masculine and feminine energies is both personal and collective. By critically examining modern narratives, honoring ancestral wisdom, and actively integrating these energies within ourselves, we pave the way for a more harmonious and evolved society.​

Cover Image Suggestion:

An abstract representation of intertwined masculine and feminine symbols, illuminated to convey unity and balance, serving as a visual metaphor for the harmonious integration of these energies.​

(BVO)In American Soda legal but is BANNED In Countries Around The World 🚫🤔🥤

 BROMINATED VEGETABLE OIL better known as (BVO) has been banned in all of Europe and Japan, for being very toxic to human health. Many go as far as to say, "its a cancer causing agent". The Guardian reports, "the additive in north American drinks can contain BVO at up to 15 parts per million (ppm). It's a vegetable oil, derived from corn or soy, bonded with the element bromine to prevent the flavoring from separating and floating to the surface.  

BVO has been added to over 10 percent of sodas in North America for decades even though Studies suggest that BVO can build up in human tissues, and animal studies have found it causes reproductive and behavioral problems in large doses. 

According to Scientific American:

"Reports from an industry group helped the U.S. Food and Drug Administration establish in 1977 what it considers a safe limit for BVO in sodas. 

But some scientists say that limit is based on data that is thin and several decades old, and they insist that the chemical deserves a fresh look ... 

With natural alternatives already in use in other countries, why not switch in North America too?"

According to the featured article, the following citrus-flavored sodas and energy drinks, sold in the US do contain BVO: 

• Mountain Dew

• Squirt

• Fanta Orange

• Sunkist

• Pineapple Gatorade

• Thirst Quencher Orange

• Powerade

• Strawberry Lemonade Fresca Original Citrus

This is not a complete list however. All in all, above 10 percent of all sodas sold in the U.S. contain BVO, so it pays to read the list of ingredients. Better yet, make a concerted effort to eliminate soda from your diet altogether. With or without BVO, sodas contain so many ingredients harmful to human health—high fructose corn syrup being one of the foremost culprits—that they really have no redeeming value whatsoever.

--

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/11/brominated-vegetable-oil-in-us-soda.aspx

https://www.instagram.com/p/BnaCPR8le_L/?taken-by=standup911

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mountain-dew-contain-chemical-known-bvo/

one garbage truck worth of plastic is dumped into the ocean EVERY MINUTE.🚮🗑🐟🐳💀

Yearly, a discusting 1.4 billion pounds of trash ends up in our once blue oceans.EVERY MINUTE, ONE GARBAGE TRUCK WORTH OF PLASTIC IS DUMPED INTO THE OCEAN. 

How Does This Much Trash Get in the Ocean?

There are many reasons why this huge amount of trash enters our oceans every single day. One reason is due to poor trash management by the Waste Management Department in many regions of the world. In Ghana, a state in Africa, the Waste Management Department is currently capable of collecting only 60% of the waste generated daily. The rest is dumped in open spaces, surface drains, and into bodies of water. This is a prime example of how even when we properly dispose of our trash in appropriate containers and it is collected and brought to a landfill, our waste can still find its way, whether directly or indirectly, into our oceans. The best way to eliminate the amount of trash in our landfills is to recycle all glass, plastics, papers, and aluminum products. 80% of the trash that can be found in our landfills is recyclable. This is a staggering number than can be drastically decreased if more people made recycling a part of their everyday life.

To date, there have been 275 billion plastic bags produced worldwide in just 2017 alone. Every second, a massive amount of 160,000 plastic bags are being produced and used. By the end of this year, we will have used 5 billion plastic bags. According to The World Count of these 5 billion bags, 5 million of them will make their way into the ocean either indirectly due to things like poor waste management, or directly by people who unfortunately do not know the significant consequences to the environment from their actions. Additionally, only less than 1% of these used plastic bags are properly recycled. This is why plastic is the number one and most serious source of pollution in the ocean.

Once the trash reaches the ocean, where does it all go? You may be at the beach and not see any trash around you and wonder how there can be over 5.25 trillion pieces and counting. One of the main places our trash travels to is The North Pacific Ocean Gyre, or as most people known it as, the infamous Great Pacific Garbage Patch. An ocean gyre is defined as a system of circular ocean currents formed by the Earth's wind patterns and the forces created by the rotation of the planet (National Geographic). Despite its name, there is nothing great about this swirling mass of trash that is four times the size of Texas. This ocean gyre has become so filled with trash, that it was once thought you could see it from space. That theory has since been proven wrong (March 2018) and is actually worse than we imagined. Much of the trash found in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is microplastic.

Why here? The Great Pacific Patch has the strongest currents of all the five ocean gyres and is located between the Hawaiian Islands and California. Unfortunately, most of the trash from around the world travels here through currents and gets sucked into the swirling mass where it remains until it can decompose in time. And the most common found trash in this swirling vortex? You guessed it - plastic.

(WATCH VIDEO BY CLICKING BELOW)

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

--

https://4ocean.com/blogs/blog/how-much-trash-is-in-our-ocean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c9mSVPXYxU&feature=youtu.be

WHAT IS Cloud Seeding exactly? ☁️⛈

   What is cloud seeding? What chemicals are involved in cloud seeding? How frequently are we using cloud seeding technology and where? Is it a safe for human, animal and plant populations? What about our water? All very good questions to be asking yourself and any one else that sees the trails in the sky. Although previously denied by our government that cloud seeding and experiments like it were taking place, they now admit to experimenting with cloud seeding. 

In fact, If you wanted a guarantee that it wouldn’t rain on your wedding day in 2015, you could have done so for the small price of $130,000. That's what Luxury holiday company Oliver’s Travels offered with a promise of “fair weather and blue skies”, which may sound like just a gimmick to get the loved-up to cough up, but behind its grand promise was the same technology being used by governments around the world to control rain.

In 2016, 56 countries had cloud seeding operations, compared to 42 in 2011, as estimated by the World Meteorological Association. China even turned to cloud seeding to keep rain away from the 2008 Beijing Olympics, by inducing rain come before opening ceremonies. 

Well, according to Wikipedia, The definition of cloud seeding is;

"A form of weather modification, is the attempt to change the amount or type of precipitation that falls from clouds, by dispersing substances into the air that serve as cloud condensation , which alter the microphysical processes within the cloud".

Cloud seeding can be done by ground generators, plane, or rocket. According to How Stuff Works, ( http://science.howstuffworks.com/cloud-seeding1.htm ).

There are three methods of cloud seeding:

• "Static cloud seeding involves spreading a chemical like silver iodide into clouds. The silver iodide provides a crystal around which moisture can condense. The moisture is already present in the clouds, but silver iodide essentially makes rain clouds more effective at dispensing their water.

• Dynamic cloud seeding aims to boost vertical air currents, which encourages more water to pass through the clouds, translating into more rain. Up to 100 times more ice crystals are used in dynamic cloud seeding than in the static method. The process is considered more complex than static clouding seeding because it depends on a sequence of events working properly. Dr. William R. Cotton, a professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University, and other researchers break down dynamic cloud seeding into 11 separate stages. An unexpected outcome in one stage could ruin the entire process, making the technique less dependable than static cloud seeding.

• Hygroscopic cloud seeding disperses salts through flares or explosives in the lower portions of clouds. The salts grow in size as water joins with them. In his report on cloud seeding, Cotton says that hygroscopic cloud seeding holds much promise, but requires further research."

   Now, let's take those chemicals listed above, and look them up because after all, what goes up, eventually falls back down right? Along with the chemicals mentioned above,  listed here are chemicals named from other sources in relationship to cloud seeding. Also listed are chemicals being found in rain water where cloud seeding trails have been present. Let's see what we can find out about the description of the chemicals and the health risks for humans. Let's go back to Wikipedia for that information. We will start with the chemicals listed in the two sources above. The ones toward the bottom of the list are chemicals found in rainwater where trails have been present.

According to Wikipedia;

"Carbon Dioxide (chemical used for dry ice)

is a chemical compound composed of two  oxygen atoms  to a single carbon atom. It is a gas at standard temperature and pressure and exists in Earth's atmosphere in this state. CO2 is  a trace gas being only 0.038% of the atmosphere.

Health Issues

• '1% can cause drowsiness with prolonged exposure.

• At 2% it is mildly narcotic and causes increased blood pressure and pulse rate, and causes reduced hearing.

• At about 5% it causes stimulation of the respiratory centre, dizziness, confusion and difficulty in breathing accompanied by headache and shortness of breath.. In addition at this concentration panic attacks may occur.

• At about 8% it causes headache, sweating, dim vision, tremor and loss of consciousness after exposure for between five and ten minutes.

Carbon dioxide content in fresh air (averaged between sea-level and 10 hPa level, i.e. about 30 km altitude) varies between 0.036% (360 ppm) and 0.039% (390 ppm), depending on the location.

Prolonged exposure to moderate, concentrations can cause acidosis and adverse effects on calcium phosphorus metabolism resulting in increased calcium deposits in soft tissue. Carbon dioxide is toxic to the heart and causes diminished contractile force.

Toxicity and its effects increase with the concentration of CO2, here given in volume percent of CO2 in the air:

A natural disaster linked to CO2 intoxication occurred during the limnic eruptions in the CO2-rich lakes of Monoun and Nyos in the Okun range of North-West Cameroon: the gas was brutally expelled from the mountain lakes and leaked into the surrounding valleys, killing most animal forms. During the Lake Nyos tragedy of 1988, 1700 villagers and 3500 livestock died.

Due to the health risks associated with carbon dioxide exposure, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration says that average exposure for healthy adults during an eight-hour work day should not exceed 5,000 ppm (0.5%). The maximum safe level for infants, children, the elderly and individuals with cardio-pulmonary health issues is significantly less. For short-term (under ten minutes) exposure, the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) limit is 30,000 ppm (3%). NIOSH also states that carbon dioxide concentrations exceeding 4% are immediately dangerous to life and health although physiological experiments show that such levels can be tolerated for some time .

Adaptation to increased levels of CO2 occurs in humans. Continuous inhalation of CO2 can be tolerated at three percent inspired concentrations for at least one month and four percent inspired concentrations for over a week. It was suggested that 2.0 percent inspired concentrations could be used for closed air spaces (e.g. a submarine) since the adaptation is physiological and reversible. Decrement in performance or in normal physical activity does not happen at this level. However, it should be noted that submarines have carbon dioxide scrubbers which reduce a significant amount of the CO2 present.

Silver Iodode

(AgI) is an inorganic compound. This yellow photosensitive solid is used in photography, as an antiseptic in medicine, and in rainmaking or cloud seeding. Silver iodide is highly insoluble in water. 
The crystalline structure of AgI is similar to that of ice, allowing it to induce freezing (heterogeneous nucleation) in cloud seeding for the purpose of rainmaking. Approximately 50,000 kg/year are used for this purpose, each seeding experiment consuming 10-50 grams

Health issues

Under the guidelines of the Clean Water Act by the EPA, silver iodide is considered a hazardous substance, a priority pollutant, and as a toxic pollutant.

Chronic Exposure/Target Organs: Chronic ingestion of iodides may produce “iodism”, which may be manifested by skin rash, running nose, headache and irritation of the mucous membranes. Weakness, anemia, loss of weight and general depression may also occur. Chronic inhalation or ingestion may cause argyria characterized by blue-gray discoloration of the eyes, skin and mucous membranes. Chronic skin contact may cause permanent discoloration of the skin.

Calcium Chloride

A common salt and the compound of Calcium and Chlorine. It behaves as a typical ionic halide, and is solid at room temperature. It has several common applications such as brine for refrigeration plants, ice and dust control on roads, and in concrete. The anhydrous salt is also widely  used as a desiccant, where it will adsorb so much water that it will eventually dissolve in its own crystal lattice water.

Health Issues

Calcium chloride is an irritant, particularly on moist skin. Dry calcium chloride reacts exothermically when exposed to water. Burns can result in the mouth and esophagus if humans or other animals ingest dry calcium chloride pellets. Small children are more susceptible than adults (who generally have had experience trying to eat hot food, and can react accordingly) so calcium chloride pellets should be kept out of their reach. Excess ingestion of calcium can lead to kidney stones.

Potassium Chloride

A metal halide salt composed of potassium and chlorine. In its pure state it is odorless. It has a white or colorless vitreous crystal, with a crystal structurethat cleaves easily in three directions. Potassium chloride crystals are face-centered cubic. Potassium chloride is occasionally known as "muriate of potash," particularly when used as a fertilizer. Potash varies in color from pink or red to white depending on the mining and recovery process used. 

Health Issues

The lethal effects of potassium chloride overdoses has led to its use in lethal injection. Jack Kevorkian's thanatron machine injected a lethal dose of potassium chloride into the patient, which caused the heart to stop functioning, after a sodium thiopental-induced coma was achieved. A similar device, the German 'Perfusor', also uses potassium chloride as a suicide aid Orally, KCl is toxic in excess; the LD is around 2.5 g/kg (meaning that a lethal dose for 50% of people weighing 75 kg (165 lb) is about 190 g (6.7 ounces), or about 3.4 fluid ounces). Intravenously this is reduced to just over 100 mg/kg, but of more concern are its severe effects on the cardiac muscles; high doses can cause cardiac arrest and rapid death, ergo its aforementioned use as the third and final drug delivered in the lethal injection process

Sodium hydroxide

Also known as lye and caustic soda, is a caustic metallic base. It is used in many  industries, mostly as a strong chemical base in the manufacture of pulpand paper, textiles, drinking water, soaps and detergents and as a drain cleaner.[citation needed] World-wide production in 1998 was around 45 million tonnes.[citation needed] Sodium hydroxide is a common base in chemical laboratories.

Health Issues

Solid sodium hydroxide or solutions of sodium hydroxide will cause chemical burns, permanent injury or scarring, and blindness if it contacts unprotected human or animal tissue. Protective equipment such as rubber gloves, safety clothing and eye protection should always be used when handling the material or its solutions.

Dissolution of sodium hydroxide is highly exothermic, and the resulting heat may cause heat burns or ignite flammables.

Thorium Oxide
Pure thorium is a silvery-white metal which is air-stable and retains its luster for several months. When contaminated with the oxide, thorium slowly tarnishes in air, becoming gray and finally black. The physical properties of thorium are greatly influenced by the degree of contamination with the oxide. The purest specimens often contain several tenths of a percent of the oxide. Pure thorium is soft, very ductile, and can be cold-rolled, swaged, and drawn. 
 
Health Issues

Powdered thorium metal is pyrophoric and will often ignite spontaneously in air. Natural thorium decays very slowly compared to many other radioactive materials, and the alpha radiation emitted cannot penetrate human skin meaning owning and handling small amounts of thorium, such as a gas mantle, is considered safe. Exposure to an aerosol of thorium can lead to increased risk of cancers of the lung, pancreas and blood, as lungs and other internal organs can be penetrated by alpha radiation. Exposure to thorium internally leads to increased risk of liver diseases. The element has no known biological role.

Aluminum Oxide

A silvery white and ductile member of the boron group of chemical elements. It has the symbol Al; its atomic number is 13. It is not soluble in water under normal circumstances. Aluminium is the most abundant metal in the Earth's crust, and  the third most abundant element therein, after oxygen and silicon. It makes up about 8% by weight of the Earth's solid surface. Aluminium is too reactive chemically to occur in nature as a free metal. Instead, it is found combined in over 270 different minerals. The chief source of aluminium is bauxite ore.

Health Issues

Despite its natural abundance, aluminium has no known function in living cells and presents some toxic effects in elevated concentrations. Its toxicity can be traced to deposition in bone and the central nervous system, which is particularly increased in patients with reduced renal function. Because aluminium competes with calcium for absorption, increased amounts of dietary aluminium may contribute to the reduced skeletal mineralization (osteopenia) observed in preterm infants and infants with growth retardation. In very high doses, aluminium can cause neurotoxicity, and is associated with altered function of the blood-brain barrier. A small percentage of people are allergic to aluminium and experience contact dermatitis, digestive disorders, vomiting or other symptoms upon contact or ingestion of products containing aluminium, such as deodorants or antacids. In those without allergies, aluminium is not as toxic as heavy metals, but there is evidence of some toxicity if it is consumed in excessive amounts. Although the use of aluminium cookware has not been shown to lead to aluminium toxicity in general, excessive consumption of antacids containing aluminium compounds and excessive use of aluminium-containing antiperspirants provide more significant exposure levels. Studies have shown that consumption of acidic foods or liquids with aluminium significantly increases aluminium absorption, and maltol has been shown to increase the accumulation of aluminium in nervous and osseus tissue.Furthermore, aluminium increases estrogen-related gene expression in human breast cancer cells cultured in the laboratory. These salts' estrogen-like effects have led to their classification as a metalloestrogen.

Because of its potentially toxic effects, aluminium's use in some antiperspirants, dyes (such as aluminum lake), and food additives is controversial. Although there is little evidence that normal exposure to aluminium presents a risk to healthy adults, several studies point to risks associated with increased exposure to the metal. Aluminium in food may be absorbed more than aluminium from water. Some researchers have expressed concerns that the aluminium in antiperspirants may increase the risk of breast cancer, and aluminium has  controversially been implicated as a factor in Alzheimer's disease. The Camelford water pollution incident involved a number of people consuming aluminium sulphate. Investigations of the long-term health effects are still ongoing, but elevated brain aluminium concentrations have been found in post-mortem examinations of victims who have later died, and further research to determine if there is a link with cerebral amyloid angiopathy has been commissioned.

According to The Alzheimer's Society, the overwhelming medical and scientific opinion is that studies have not convincingly demonstrated a causal relationship between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease. Nevertheless, some studies, such as those on the PAQUID cohort, cite aluminium exposure as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. Some brain plaques have been found to contain increased levels of the  metal. Research in this area has been inconclusive; aluminium accumulation may be a consequence of the disease rather than a causal agent. In any event, if there is any toxicity of aluminium, it must be via a very specific mechanism, since total human exposure to the element in the form of naturally occurring clay in soil and dust is enormously large over a lifetime. Scientific consensus does not yet exist about whether aluminium exposure could directly increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Boron

the chemical element with atomic number 5 and the chemical symbol B. Boron is a trivalent metalloid element which occurs abundantly in the evaporite ores borax and ulexite.

Several allotropes of boron exist: amorphous boron is a brown powder; whereas crystalline boron is black, extremely hard (about 9.5 on Mohs' scale), and a poor conductor at room temperature. Elemental boron is used as a dopant in the semiconductor industry, while boron compounds play important roles as light structural materials, insecticides and preservatives, and reagents for chemical synthesis.

Health Issues

Elemental boron and borates are non-toxic to humans and animals (approximately similar to table salt). The LD50 (dose at which there is 50% mortality) for animals is about 6 g per kg of body weight. Substances with LD50 above 2 g are considered non-toxic. The minimum lethal dose for humans has not been established, but an intake of 4 g/day was reported without incidents, and medical dosages of 20 g of boric acid for neutron capture therapy caused no problems. Fish have survived for 30 min in a saturated boric acid solution and can survive longer in strong borax solutions.Borates are more toxic to insects than to mammals. The boranes and similar gaseous compounds are quite poisonous. As usual, it is not an element that is intrinsically poisonous, but toxicity depends on structure.

     There are a few more things to consider. NASA now has a website aimed at recruiting our teachers and school aged children to be observers and reporters of contrails in their areas. On that site they provide an explanation of contrails, the different types to be observed and they also provide satellite imagery of contrails. I strongly urge you to check it out. My personal concern is for the children being even more exposed to the chemicals being released in the trails, by sitting under and observing them for extended periods of time. There is also no mention of any chemicals used or cloud seeding at this site, they claim contrails are nothing more than jet fuel emissions (pollution) that are contributing to "Global Warming". Chemicals are called "particulates". Here is the link for that site.   
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/>
 

---

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-413453

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/cloud-seeding-weather-control-manipulate-effects-chemicals-climate-change-a8160146.html

IT’S OFFICIAL, COLONIZATION ON MARS IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING 👀🌍🚀

One year after Elon Musk unveiled his grand plans to send humans to Mars, the SpaceX CEO made some refinements. Musk returned to the same annual space conference where he made that original announcement, the International Astronautical Congress, to detail the new version of those plans. 

“Now we think we have a better way to do it,” he said Friday. The key is a new rocket — smaller than the one he described at a conference in Mexico last year but still bigger than anything ever launched — and a new spaceship.For Mars colonists, the rocket would lift a spaceship with 40 cabins, and with two to three people per cabin, it would carry about 100 people per flight. After launching, the B.F.R. booster would return to the launching pad; the spaceship would continue to orbit, where it would refill its tanks of methane and oxygen propellant before embarking on the months long journey to Mars. Because all parts of the rocket and the spaceship are to be fully reusable, the cost of operating them would be low. Even on Earth, the rockets, traveling at up to 18,000 miles per hour, could make long-distance trips short — New York to Shanghai in 39 minutes, for example. Any two points on Earth would be less than an hour apart, Mr. Musk said.

After the presentation, Mr. Musk took to Instagram to elaborate on the price of those round-the-world rocket flights: “Cost per seat should be about the same as full fare economy in an aircraft. Forgot to mention that.” Mr. Musk maintained a highly optimistic schedule for his Mars dreams. He said the company had already started work to build pieces of the new rocket. A cargo mission, without any passengers, could launch as early as 2022. “That’s not a typo, although it is aspirational,” he said. “Five years feels like a long time to me.” Two years later, which will be the next time that Mars and Earth swing by each other, SpaceX would launch four B.F.R.s to Mars — two carrying cargo, two carrying people.